<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Earprints</title>
	<atom:link href="http://listenwithyourownears.com/2008/08/26/earprints/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://listenwithyourownears.com/2008/08/26/earprints/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:41:03 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Mariette</title>
		<link>http://listenwithyourownears.com/2008/08/26/earprints/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Mariette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arkamis.wordpress.com/?p=142#comment-85</guid>
		<description>hi David,
The Wightman &amp; Kistler article and the Hofman et al article it refers to both make a case that humans can adapt to achieve very good localisation with non-personalised HRTFs...
Is there evidence that makes the opposite case - that it is necessary to have personalised HRTFs, despite adaptation?
or is adaptation simply too slow or not effective enough to be useful?
Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi David,<br />
The Wightman &amp; Kistler article and the Hofman et al article it refers to both make a case that humans can adapt to achieve very good localisation with non-personalised HRTFs&#8230;<br />
Is there evidence that makes the opposite case &#8211; that it is necessary to have personalised HRTFs, despite adaptation?<br />
or is adaptation simply too slow or not effective enough to be useful?<br />
Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
